Jane Austen’s Persuasion and the Moral of Persuasion as a Virtue

Persuasion is a story about Anne Elliot and Frederick Wentworth who were in love eight and a half years ago.  Her friend Lady Russel persuades Anne that it's not wise to marry a penniless naval officer when she is only 19, so she refuses Frederick.  Eight and a half years later Anne's father has spent so much money they must move to Bath and rent out Kellynch Hall to tenants.  Admiral and Mrs. Croft, the sister of the now wealthy Captain Frederick Wentworth become the tenants of Kellynch Hall.  It's a story about pride, choices, persuasion, and second chances.  Or perhaps even third chances.  It's moving, emotional, and mature in a way that appeals to those of us who have lived through some difficult choices, that is to say, lived.

Part of the charm of this story, and one might argue, every Austen story, is the thoughtful way it deals with flawed traits.  A casual observer might say that Anne is flawed because she is too weak-willed, too willing to be persuaded to other points of view.  In fact, Frederick believes it at first when he is still bitter about being refused.  However, as the story progresses it becomes increasingly clear that persuasion, like any trait, has its good sides.  A person's strength is often their weakness.  So the story goes about telling us how the weakness of Anne at 19 is actually her strength at a more mature age.

The story of Persuasion tells us repeatedly that being capable of being persuaded to see reason and amend one's own position based on logic and rationale is a good thing, even when it has difficult consequences.  Those characters who cannot be persuaded to be sensible, who act only on feelings, end up feeling the consequences in visibly negative ways.  People who can't be persuaded end up: insolvent because they can't be persuaded to spend money wisely (like Sir Walter), friendless because they cannot be persuaded to see value in people outside of social rank and flattery (like Elizabeth), severely injured because they cannot be persuaded that their ideas are foolish and dangerous (like Louisa), or even alone because they cannot be persuaded to overcome their pride (like Captain Wentworth at first).

Persuasion as a Force of Good

Sir Walter judging the appearance of a naval man

At every turn success and well-being of the characters comes with the ability to be persuaded to see and act rationally.  Sir Walter and Elizabeth enjoy better society in Bath once they are persuaded to go there to live more cheaply and attempt to pay their debts.  Captain Benwick is able to rejoin the happy and lively world of the future once he is persuaded that he should read more prose and should think of moving forward now, not living solely in the past.  Only after he realizes that he must, does he find Louisa agreeable enough to pursue and marry.  Anne is persuaded that the Elliot pride is directly hindering her happiness and starts to act against it by fighting to maintain friendships her family does not approve of and ultimately trying to show Captain Wentworth her feelings.  Captain Wentworth is persuaded to overcome his pride and finally pursue Anne in Bath, and it is from that decision that his happiness ultimately stems.

Persuasion can be a moderating force.  It can help you balance out your tendencies towards pride, towards vanity, towards making rash decisions.  It can help encourage good behavior and ameliorate foolish ideas.  No person is without flaws.  This is part of the reason why it is important to have intelligent people around you who want good things for you.  These friends can help you balance out mistakes and misunderstandings with different perspectives and smooth out flaws in yourself with their influence, their persuasion.

Persuasion as a Portion of Duty - Material Considerations

At the heart of the story is that first act of persuasion by Lady Russel, which led Anne to be persuaded by duty and logic not to accept Captain Wentworth when she was only 19 and he was a young penniless naval officer.  Some people and adaptations think this was a bad thing, but Jane Austen tells us it was not.  Anne doesn't regret being persuaded to not accept Captain Wentworth when they were so young and he was penniless.  I think both Anne and Lady Russel were aware that Elizabeth was not likely to make a good match, none of the daughters were going to inherit the estate, they weren't even on speaking terms with the heir.  They had no dowry, considering that Sir Walter had spent every penny and was in shocking piles of debt.  It looked as though Anne would have to marry well to be safe and possibly care for her sisters once Sir Walter had gone.  Was it fair that she was therefore persuaded that love was not enough?  No.  But it was a very rational choice at the time.  Even if he had been prosperous straight off, if he had died immediately (a possibility in a war), she would have been left a widow.  We see in both Mrs. Clay and Mrs. Smith, both widowed very young, that such a situation leaves the women vulnerable and leads to some difficult choices for them.

  And Anne says that she considered it a duty to Lady Russel who she considered a mother figure, to listen to her advice in that matter.  She did not regret being persuaded in that case.  Anne tells Wentworth "I was perfectly right in being guided" by Lady Russell "to me, she was in the place of a parent.  I am not saying that she did not err in her advice." Only that "I was right in submitting to her, and that if I had done otherwise I should have suffered more in continuing the engagement than I did even in giving it up because I should have suffered in my conscience.  I have now, as far as such a sentiment is allowable in human nature, nothing to reproach myself with; and if I mistake not, a strong sense of duty is no bad part of a woman's portion".

Being persuaded not to accept Captain Wentworth before he had made any money was a wise decision at the moment that is was made at the behest of a person she considered a mother figure.  She regretted that it had kept them apart after Frederick had returned with money and a promising future in the navy, but not that she had been persuaded those eight and half years ago.  The reason this novel feels like it has a more adult perspective is because it is many ways concerned with analysing past choices and learning from previous mistakes, a thing all adults must do to grow.  It is possible to look back and think that a decision was the right one at the time but also regret what it's current consequences are.  To be able to say you were glad that you were guided by your parent figure, Lady Russel, but also that you know her advice was wrong.  And to blame neither yourself nor her.  That's a very difficult thing to do but is a part of having an older perspective on life.

Persuasion vs. Pride/Stubbornness 

As with all Jane Austen novels, this story has a subtlety and a nuance that I love.  It does not advocate for anyone to constantly be persuaded out of the things they want and should do, nor to be incapable of being persuaded to do the right things against what your current desires may be.  Jane Austen, this story demands that a balance of these qualities is necessary.

Captain Wentworth almost loses Anne because his hurt pride leads him to stubbornly not reach out to her when he returns that first year with money enough to keep her.  After they have finally reconnected at the end of the book he admits to her that it was pride that had prevented him from writing to her when he had a few thousand pounds a ship under his command.  They both realize they could have avoided the last few years of misery and separation if he had done so.

Captain Wentworth nearly loses Anne again when his pride, still hurt, eight and half years later, leads him to court Louisa.  He only learns his lesson when, at Lyme, he realizes that Louisa and her whole family are expecting him to offer Louisa marriage as soon as she is well.  He says he removes himself from Lyme to allow her to heal and lessen her attachment as much as is honourable.  But he was willing to marry her against his wishes because it was the right thing to do.  If the whole family expects an engagement, he is toying with Louisa's reputation and that is unpardonable because it could affect her chances for a happy future.  The moment he realizes he must balance his desires against the realities of his actions is the moment he grows as a character.  Luckily, Louisa and Captain Benwick become attached during her recovery and Frederick is free to pursue Anne as he wishes, swallow his pride, and come to find her in Bath.

Anne and Henrietta show different sides of the same decision.  Henrietta was almost persuaded by Mary's nonsense that she shouldn't marry Henry Hayter.  Jane Austen sets this up as an example of being too weak-willed and gentle.  She is not being persuaded against Henry Hayter for good and logical reasons.  Henrietta is being persuaded out of Mary's unreasonable dislike of him, and a foolish desire to continue flirting and being flattered with Captain Wentworth who is so dashing and charming and new.  She ought to have stuck to her purpose when there was no logical reason to be persuaded otherwise.  She learns this in time to win back her intended.  Then there is Louisa who is a foil to Anne.  She is too stubborn and heedless to be persuaded of anything.  This is a character trait that first attracts Captain Wentworth who is trying to forget Anne by courting someone completely unlike her.  Louisa who is too stubborn to even see reason (let alone propriety and duty) ends up unconscious on a pier, nearly dead because of it.

For Anne, being persuaded to give up Frederick at 19, was the right choice.  However, when they meet again, she is too proud to express her feelings, as is he and they suffer through a few more things before it all works out in the end.

Finding the Balance

When Anne and Captain Wentworth are reconciled and together at the end of the book he tells her how he finally had begun to see Anne's true character at Lyme when he had occasion to witness what being far too stubborn could be dangerous.   Captain Wentworth describes Anne as being the "loveliest medium of fortitude and gentleness"  At Lyme, he says he had "learnt to distinguish between the steadiness of principle and the obstinacy of self-will, between darings of heedlessness and the resolution of a collected mind. There he had seen everything to exalt in his estimation the woman he had lost; and there begun to deplore the pride, the folly, the madness of resentment, which had kept him from trying to regain her when thrown in his way."  Anne was in that elusive middle ground between firmness of character and capable of being guided.

Jane Austen urges us to consider that it is the middle ground that is ideal.  Being capable of sticking to your purpose but also knowing when logic must prevail over feelings.  Having both learned their lessons, Anne and Wentworth are now adults who have addressed some of their flaws and are ready to enter into a healthy relationship.  Anne learned that she must be more firm in her purpose now that she is an adult and refuses to be persuaded into marrying Mr. Elliot or from canceling her plans to visit Mrs. Smith for an impromptu visit of the Dalrymples.  Captain Wentworth learned that his pride and stubbornness were preventing him from being happy and he learns to act less on his surface emotions and more on rational plans to pursue his own real happiness.  Jane Austen argues the couple is happier for being reunited, "more tender, more tried, more fixed in a knowledge of each other's character, truth, and attachment; more equal to act, more justified in acting."  We know that Anne and Frederick have grown as people and will have a very happy marriage indeed.

More Jane Austen Please!

If you are interested in more discussion of Jane Austen, I have more for you.

For a start, you can see my ranking of every movie adaptation of Persuasion on this page here.

And if that's not enough don't worry you can see my discussions of the movie adaptations of all the other Jane Austen novels and even, a mad attempt at ranking them all together.  Why did I do this?  I think I must be crazy.  Oh wait, we already knew this.  Anyway...

To see my ranking of Every Jane Austen Adaptation, go here.
To see my ranking of all the Pride and Prejudice adaptations you can go here.
To see my ranking of all the Emma Adaptations you can go here.
To see my ranking of all the Sense and Sensibility adaptations you can go here.
To see my ranking of all the Mansfield Park Adaptations you can go here.
To see my ranking of all the Northanger Abbey Adaptations you can go here.

For my discussion of the Lady Susan Adaptation (Love and Friendship), you can go here. 

To see my ranking of all the "Not-Quite-Austen's" you can go here.

I have a whole page dedicated to Jane Austen where you can find my rankings of different movie adaptations and essays etc.

All Things Jane Austen

Northanger Abbey - Movie Adaptations Ranked

Northanger Abbey 

This is just a fun story.  You can see Austen wrestling with what makes a story a good story, what novels are really about, and whether they have value.  (When Austen was writing books, novels were not considered valuable as compared to serious books on subjects such as history, etc.)  Northanger Abbey is fun, it's youthful and Henry Tilney is a great character.

1. Northanger Abbey 2007  with J.J. Field

            Oh my goodness I love this version.  I love the chemistry between J.J. Field and Felicity Jones.  You believe that Catherine is young and a bit fanciful but not in an irritating way, as they portray her in some other versions.  I love that Henry is teasing but not irritating or creepily mysterious in this version.  The characters all feel like people in this adaptation, and that's my favorite thing about stories.  I know, I'm crazy.

I think Miss Thorpe is perfect in her role.  She is boy crazy and scheming in a totally charming way that would draw anyone not incredibly suspicious in.  You can see why Catherine falls into a friendship with her and why the poor brother James cannot see he's being toyed with by her.  I love that we see Catherine being angry with her after she's found out how poorly Miss Thorpe has treated her brother James.

Actually, everyone is perfect in this version.  Mrs. Morland is really cute in this.  She understands her daughter and her strengths and weaknesses well.  She's caring, but not bling to Catherine's general silliness.  She's supportive and strong.  I love her character in this movie.

Mr. and Mrs. Morland have a quick conversation about whether Catherine reads too many novels.  I adore that we see them being concerned and active parents without being overbearing.  I love that it allows us to both discuss and foreshadow the problem of novels.  Reading them is fine, but starting to see fanciful and dreadful things in life that aren't there, simply because you think you are living in a novel, is a problem.  I love that we see Catherine growing up and it's at a believable pace even in such a short movie.  It's charming to see her teaching her younger siblings about the lessons she has learned.

I do enjoy watching poor Henry's family.  The older brother is insufferably vain and unpleasant.  The father is commanding and imperious and frighteningly unpleasant.  You totally understand why Catherine thinks he may have murdered his wife, he feels cold and almost violent.

I love Catherine.  She's still young and fanciful but she's not so irritatingly young that it's hard to watch.  She is curious and enthusiastic and I love her this way.  I adore the scene where she frightens herself looking at old papers in her room with the thunder outside.  The next morning when she discovers that they are laundry lists she is so disappointed and it's so cute.

Oh, and all the scenes that come after General Tilney has left are lovely.  The falling in love montage, over apple picking, apple roasting, and the race to see his home in the rain on horseback is so perfect.  The way that Mr. Tilney gently lifts Catherine off the horse and reverently touches her face to remove the mud.... well, it defies words because your heart is too busy melting to form coherent sentences.  It's perfection.  I love this movie entirely.

Mr. Tilney as played by J.J. Field is entirely too amazing.  I'm not capable of mustering enough praise for him.  He teases, but he is not unkind.  He is a little bit outside of convention but still is a gentleman.  He is tender and patient.  He doesn't use her silliness to his advantage, he instructs her.  It's all so tender.

I really can't recommend this movie enough.  I had seen the older version and never thought to watch it again until I went to write this post.  This 2007 adaptation is so lovely that it has become one of my favorites to rewatch.

2. Northanger Abbey 1987

             I watched this for the first time one summer afternoon with my mother.  Neither of us knew anything about it, hadn't read the book, or seen another adaptation.  It was so odd.  I didn't like the portrayal of Mr. Tilney or Catherine.   I loved the scene with everyone in the baths with their bonnets on and full-length bathing costumes on while they paraded slowly through the bath waters with floating trays of bath salts in front of them.  It was delightfully weird and awkward.  I loved it.  But, as much as I loved that scene, I was equally horrified by the "Gothic" dreams that Catherine has in this one.  The scene with the lady sewing her fingers together still haunts me in an active way.

One of Catherine's creepy Gothic dreams

 I watched this for the first time one summer afternoon with my mother and we were not prepared for it.  At the time neither of us knew anything about the story, hadn't read the book, or seen another adaptation.  We had expected something feeling like Pride and Prejudice.  We got this.  It was so odd.

             I didn't like the portrayal of Mr. Tilney, he was creepy, or Catherine who I also felt was weird and creepy.  I would not rewatch this version except for one single scene.

             The one scene I particularly like in this adaptation is the bathing scene.  Everyone is in the baths with their bonnets on and full-length bathing costumes on while they parade slowly through the bath waters chatting with friends socially with floating trays in front of them.  I believe they contain aromatic plants and perfumes.  It was delightfully weird and awkward.  I loved it.

             But, as much as I loved that scene, I was equally horrified by the "Gothic" dreams that Catherine has in this one.  The scene with an old lady sewing her fingers together still haunts me to this day.  I have actually had my own Gothic nightmares about it.  So I'm not a fan of this particular adaptation.

       I much prefer the 2007 Northanger Abbey with a portrayal of Catherine as a more normal girl who is in love with novels and fanciful plots.  She is reading Gothic romances and exploring the idea of sexuality.  It's way less creepy feeling than the "Gothic" dreams in this version that I think of as more fitting to the horror genre.  Or perhaps I should just say that the dream sequences are way too intense and creepy for me.  This isn't what I go looking for in a Jane Austen movie.

I have found at least one person who loves this older version.  But even she admits that it has its foibles.  In fact, I think she likes it precisely because of all its melodramatic foibles.  She is right, the proposal line that Mr. Tilney has, telling Catherine that "since you left us the white rose bush has died of grief," is super romantic.  You can check out her post about Northanger Abbey and her beautiful themed soap here.

Other Versions? 

As far as I know, these are the only two film adaptations of Northanger Abbey that exist.  If I am wrong, please do let me know.

To see my ranking of Every Jane Austen Adaptation, go here.
For my discussion of all the Pride and Prejudice adaptations, you can go here.
For my discussion of all the Persuasion Adaptations, you can go here.
For my discussion of all the Emma Adaptations, you can go here.
For my discussion of all the Sense and Sensibility Adaptations, you can go here.
For my discussion of all the Mansfield Park Adaptations, you can go here.

For my discussion of the Lady Susan Adaptation (Love and Friendship), you can go here. 
For my discussion of all the "Not-Quite-Austen's" you can go here.

I have a whole page dedicated to Jane Austen where you can find my rankings of different movie adaptations and essays etc.

All Things Jane Austen

Mansfield Park - Movie Adaptations Ranked

Mansfield Park

It's harder for me to like this story because I find so many of the characters unlovable.  Fanny is not the most exciting character, but I do like her.  She is constantly being used and abused by all her relations who keep reminding her how worthless and unimportant she is.  There is really only the one exception, her cousin Edmund.  But even he ignores her and overlooks her needs during his infatuation with Mary.  So, yes, she might not be exciting, but she's essentially Cinderella.  And how can she be an exciting character when they don't let her do anything?  They treat her like a servant and an unpaid servant.  But I think she's sweet and tries really hard to be a good person and I like her the better for it.

Everyone else is rubbish.  Oh, Lady Bertram is sweet, she's just useless.  But she does love Fanny and that's kind of sweet in a way.  Lord Bertram actually realizes she's better than his daughters but treats her harshly for not bowing to his will and marrying a bad man.

I do sort of wish that she could have ended up with the bad boy and reformed him.  But in reality, I also agree with Austen that he would never have changed and that she would have been miserable.  It's just that I don't think Edmund deserved her after the whole thing with Mary Crawford, but he, I guess, he wasn't so bad as all that.  Fanny was happy with him so I suppose it's all ok.

The sisters and Aunt Norris are simply intolerable.   I love the discussion of Mansfield Park in the movie The Jane Austen Book Club, more than I love the story itself.  Mainly because all the people aside from Fanny are so awful, I don't like watching the story unfold.

1. Mansfield Park 1983 mini-series

         This is long but a well-done, faithful adaptation.  I still don't love this story (even if she is faithful and "Horton Hatches the Egg", sorry Jane Austen).  All the characters in it are pretty much awful and abusive to Fanny.

         Despite their saying they will have to treat Fanny properly and with delicacy, they don't.  Sir Thomas is barely around, Aunt Norris is incredibly heinous.  Aunt Norris is always asking Fanny to do everything that is even remotely unpleasant because she won't do anything for herself.  And then she denies her a fire in her room and chastises her for being lazy when she has a headache.  Even the Miss Bertrams, who are also wretched, acknowledge that Fanny is the last person in the world who is lazy.

         Lady Bertram is pretty great in this version though.  Constantly lying about on couches and being useless.  Her quiet voice and sweet uselessness is charming in a way.  Everyone loves her, they accept that she is useless.  It's cute that she at least values Fanny's company and is not being abusive on purpose.  I love that she offers Fanny one of pug's puppies because she loves her and knows that Fanny will treat the dog better than her daughters would.

         I like that Sir Thomas Bertram is a busy man but the moment he found out that Fanny has been denied fires and such because of Aunt Norris he rectifies it.  When he realizes that Fanny is quite grown up and pretty, he throws her a ball.  It's a coming-out ball and she's immensely excited about it.  Fanny's brother gets to attend and they are so happy to see each other.  It's adorable.

         In this version, we have to listen to Edmund go on and on about Mary Crawford and how much he loves her and it's irritating.  This Edmund also takes her horse and essentially gives it over to Mary's use and ignores Fanny like everyone else.  I really don't think he deserves her.

         The Crawford's are exceptionally oily in this version.  As much as I wish that Fanny ended up with someone who saw her merits and cared about her, I don't trust this Henry any more than Fanny does.  In this version, there is even some weird trickery with a necklace.  Mary gives it to her only to find out later it was from Henry and then they try to claim she knew and it's all rubbish.

         Fanny is Cinderella in this version.  She is sweet, kind, hard-working.  She never has a mean thing to say about anyone, always treats everyone as she ought to and she never does anything wrong.  So, in this version when Mary Crawford tries to blame all the bad behavior of Maria and Henry on Fanny, it's entirely baseless and everyone knows it.

         At four and half hours long this is a faithful adaptation but I find it hard to watch that many hours of abuse towards Fanny, the only member of Mansfield Park who deserves good treatment.  I don't love this version, but it's certainly better than the confused and inconsistent 1999 Mansfield Park.

2.  Mansfield Park 2007

This version of Mansfield Park is not the most accurate, nor the most fanciful.  This Sir Thomas says unnecessarily mean things.  It's just not that good.  It's not terrible but it's kind of meh.  The story does take some detours from the original, but they are mostly in keeping with the tone of the original.  For instance, Fanny doesn't go home, but she is left behind at Mansfield alone to contemplate why she doesn't want to marry Mr. Crawford.  

I like that this Fanny and Edmund seem to have a decent chemistry.  I do like this Edmund.  I think he does a good job of playing the role in a believable and fairly sympathetic way.  This Aunt Norris is suitably horrible.  I sort of like that Lady Bertram plays an advocate role for Fanny in the end.  Helping to give them time alone in the garden so Edmund who has just realized he likes Fanny can have a chance to do something about it.  It is odd the way they have him realize suddenly and be chasing her through the house.  But it's ok.

I really don't like this Sir Thomas.  He is both a fool and a mean person.  He says unnecessary things to Fanny and they are mean.  He shows up at long last and says nice things to everyone and tells Fanny he thinks she hasn't improved one jot in the last eight years of growing up.  In a rigidly polite society who would say this?  Ok, Aunt Norris would say this, but not Sir Thomas.  Right in front of the whole family, he takes her down that way.  It's cruel for no reason.  I hate it.  

The whole movie is filmed in one location.  So it leads to some interesting choices.  They don't send Fanny home to Portsmouth.  Apparently, they didn't find any rooms in the house that they thought were suitable for dancing.  So, they hold the ball in the garden in the grass.  And they hold the wedding for Fanny and Edmund there as well in this movie.  

I don't really like this movie, but is at least a coherent story that's not offensive for failing to address important social issues nor is it creepy or downright irritating and painful to watch.  So, it comes in above the 1999 Mansfield Park for me. 

3. Mansfield Park 1999

         This movie is just different.  It's not Mansfield Park.  It's more of a retelling with some different twists.  It keeps the base of the story and adds a modern sensibility for social justice issues.   I can't stand it.

         What makes this movie unpleasant is not the added themes of slavery, or the new way they interpret Fanny, it's that the film is neither Mansfield Park nor a consistent modern retelling.  Slavery is introduced, and then not really discussed.  If you introduce slavery you need to have it be more talked about, all the characters need to engage with it.

         Tom is supposedly a drunken wreck because he is super guilty about slavery.  So, in this film, Tom comes home from Antiga early because he can't stand the slavery, shows up at home and basically says "yes, those lovely slaves who are all paying for this stupid party," and then we immediately cut to "oh, I've had a great idea, let's put on a lavish play."  We don't see much of the play preparations, but we see lavish costumes and indelicate rehearsals without a care in the world for expense.

I'm drunk because I hate our family and slavery

Five seconds later... I know! Let's have a play!

         So, Tom is upset that slavery is paying for Mansfield Park, but he sticks around to waste a ton of that money on an improper and extremely extravagant home theater pursuit.  You can't just drop slavery into the story and have a character be like, you're all a waste because your lavish lives are built on blood money, and oh by the by, let's hold a play, I feel like using up all that blood money for something even more foolish and less worthwhile.  I mean, really!  If he is going to be so guilty about slavery he won't stay home, he should have a more convincing character arc where he tries to use his influential position to abolish it, or something.  It's your modern retelling, do something better with it than this.

Also, I'm sorry, but what is this?  Is Tom in blackface?

         Let's not even mention the fact that this version is trying to be more bold and modern and they don't have any other characters really engage with the idea of slavery.  Fanny and Edmund talk of it in passing as a thing that pays for their lifestyle and neither says anything after that, guilty or otherwise.  The only time Fanny engages with it after that is when she flees from the house when Sir Thomas offers to hold a ball for her because she doesn't want to be sold off like one of the slaves.  Holding a ball for Fanny was actually a kind gesture, more akin to a birthday party, or rather a quinceañera to show that Sir Bertram notices she's grown up and is a lady now.  Fanny was excited about it, not afraid she was being sold off to suitors. 

This is how we're handling it?

Oh, I forgot we did have one moment more of engagement with slavery, the worst moment of all, Tom's art from the trip.  Fanny and the audience get treated to graphic depictions of rape and torture of enslaved black people at the hands of the white "neighbors" and Sir Bertram.  When Sir Bertram finds Fanny looking at this art he yells at Fanny to go to her room.  He smacks the book from her hand, shouts at her, burns the paper in the fire and we are expecting a really intense resolution to the whole thing.  Then we never discuss it again.  We jump straight into Fanny finding Crawford and Maria having sex.  And that is the emotional climax of the film.  That!  The whole family frets over Maria's misdeeds and we never mention slavery, rape, or torture again.  I mean really.  You cannot introduce rape and torture and not react to it or have the characters pretend it didn't happen or react to it.  It's upsetting.

There there, I know that sex is way worse than rape and torture.

         That brings us to Fanny's portrayal.  Fanny is meant to be a person of such solid morals that she never wavers on what is right and correct.  Not so in this movie.  In this movie, Fanny wavers on everything it would seem.  She goes home because she won't marry Henry Crawford.  Then she wavers on the fear of being impoverished and agrees to marry him.  Then she refuses him once again, very cruelly, the next day.  Her sister Susan asks Fanny "are you certain?"  Fanny's reply is telling for how they portray her "I have no talent for certainty, Susie."  Well, then you aren't the Fanny Price that we all respect.

I like you, you handsome devil.

I can't marry you.

Ok, I'll marry you.

         It is hard to feel sorry for a Fanny who toys with the emotions of others.  This version makes Fanny unsympathetic, despite all the abuse and unkind behavior she has suffered.  She is no longer the sympathetic Cinderella character we all want to find happiness.  She was cruel to Henry and that's a terrible shame.  Since this isn't a faithful adaptation and since they made Henry feel like a person who genuinely loves Fanny, is genuinely charming, and she abuses that with her poor behavior.  Agreeing to an engagement and then turning it down the very next day.  Fanny is accused of being responsible for the behavior of Henry Crawford and therefore his affair with Maria.  In the book, it's a baseless accusation and a way for Mary Crawford to excuse her brother from bad behavior.  If only you'd married him, they could have had an affair, you could have been miserable, and nobody would have to be disgraced.  Mary essentially says this but in the other version blaming bad behavior on the only person who has done nothing wrong is clearly ridiculous.  In this version, the accusation is not false.  A very strong argument could be made that Henry fell into the affair with Maria because Fanny broke his heart, by accepting and then refusing his proposal so cruelly.

You're handsome, but no.

Ok, why not?

         Since this isn't really Mansfield Park they should have let Henry reform under Fanny's influence and have them both be happy together.  They should have either reformed Mary and had her marry Edmund or both of them end up alone because they both used Fanny so badly.  Every time I encounter this story there's always a part of me that really wants to see Henry reform and Fanny end up with him.  This Henry seems to genuinely care for her and I can't stand how she treats him.  Also, I don't think Edmund deserves her after all he put her through while pursuing Mary Crawford.

Just kidding I don't think I will marry you.

         I never thought Fanny was a boring character.  I thought she wasn't allowed to do anything of interest because she is Cinderella in her family.  I did like that they portray Fanny as being emotional and crying in the corridors where nobody can see her.  I just wish they'd either kept her character strong or let her marry Henry and truly reform him.  I also like the detail of Aunt Norris having Fanny left on the doorstep of Mansfield Park for two hours and blaming Fanny for it, not apologizing.  I like that Fanny writes stories and sends them to Susie throughout.  I don't like that they use them as some sort of weird moral.  Shouting "remember, run mad as often as you like, but don't faint."  It's really odd.  Also, if you're going to turn her into a strange Jane Austen figure you should at least address that she is trying to get her work published (before the end when Edmund has done it for her), maybe even say she wants to support herself that way and not rely on slave money, that would be a nice way to make it all tie in.

I could have aspirations of my own I suppose, but I don't.

         In short, it is not the introduction of slavery that I mind, it's that it isn't carried far enough or treated thoughtfully.  If you aren't going to treat the subject properly you'd better not attempt it.  The movie toyed with the characters and neither gave them new arcs to suit their new portrayal and accommodate the theme of slavery nor allowed them to suit their old arcs.  They didn't make Mansfield Park or a new story.  They did half of both and accomplished neither.  This is precisely why the movie fell flat for so many people who wanted to like it.

         I wouldn't be surprised if a remake with more slavery, more engagement with the topic, more thoughtful and deep conversations on it didn't do better in the end.  Despite the claims to the contrary, this movie was not ill-received because it was too bold.  It was just badly done.  It's not the sex or the portrayal of dark things that are wrong with this movie.  It's the way they bounce from scenes telling you that slavery and rape/torture exist in the world to playing at theater and tea parties where the worst thing in the plot is that Maria has run away with Crawford.  The emotional climax is that Maria has run away with Mr. Crawford?  Directly after we found out about rape and torture?  Are you kidding?  Even our Fanny doesn't say anything more on the topic or write about it?  It's upsetting to have the topic introduced and brushed aside.

Rushworth is so shocked by this treatment of slavery in this film that he's nearly incapacitated.  Only Aunt Norris approves.

         I still hate the majority of the characters in this story.  I feel bad for Rushworth even though he is excessively dim.  I can't stand the Miss Bertrams or Aunt Norris.  Aunt Norris is more plainly cruel but in a smaller role in this film.  I hate Mary Crawford.  I like that Fanny thinks seriously about marrying Henry, but hate that she refuses, accepts, and then refuses him again.  So very dumb and inappropriate.  I don't trust Henry, but I do really want him to reform.  He was so much closer to reform in this adaptation that it's even more criminal what they do with the story.

Yes, one might be driven to drink in this Mansfield Park.

         I do like that the movie explains Lady Bertram's uselessness as part of an addiction to Laudanum.  I like the way we see how women are faced with difficult choices about their future security; but not the way this film makes Fanny accept and refuse the proposal of Henry.  It would have been enough to have her say her heart had changed many times on the subject of Henry.  Or even that she feared poverty but still couldn't accept him. I do like that they use the bit about the starling who cannot get out to draw parallels between the misery of any human trapped by circumstances, Fanny, women in this time, and slaves.

         I like that we see more feeling and nuance from Fanny.  Frances O'Connor does a lovely job with the part she is given, I just don't like the story the movie ultimately has her tell.  Young Fanny is also completely adorable and I love her in this movie.

         I can't stand the ending of this film.  Not only is there another awkward kiss (see Persuasion for the worst one) the scenes just before and after that try to wrap up the rest of the storylines are terrible.  I can't stand the way the rest of the arcs are wrapped by NOT telling you what happened.  A freeze frame with Fanny's narration "It could have turned out differently, I suppose. But it didn't" tells us nothing and truly irritates.  Julia gets a letter from Yates, and you only know what that means if you've read or watched other versions.  This version doesn't tell you she runs off with him.  She gets the letter and we're told "it could have turned out differently".  What could?  What happens?  Could it have been different than nothing?  What exactly did it turn out as?  Are you assuming we know the story you're telling?  Because that makes you a lazy storyteller for a start.  And since you clearly aren't telling the story of Mansfield Park,  how should we know the ending unless you tell us?  What rubbish!

Rather awkward long prelude to kiss

       
         What makes this all truly sad is that this could have been a better film.  Giving Fanny emotional performances allows her to have interest even as she is held back and restricted by her not being deemed equal with the Miss Bertrams.  This film could have allowed Fanny to really shine, but then we take back her cool newly dimensional character by making her not certain of anything.  This film could have addressed slavery thoughtfully I suppose, but it didn't.  It could have given life, and a modern twist, to the characters without taking it all back, but it didn't.  It could have all turned out differently, I suppose.  But it didn't.  Much to the ruination of both the attempts to address social issues and any hint of a coherent plot or character arcs.

         I can not be alone in thinking that this doesn't go far enough with the treatment of slavery.  And I can not be alone in thinking that this version of Fanny should end up with this version of Henry Crawford.

         So, I'm going to invent a new ending.  One that suits the story this version of Mansfield Park started to tell and then failed to stick with.

         I'm going to pretend that Fanny rides this white horse straight away to Henry Crawford and she accepts his proposal of marriage.  Maria runs away with someone else in London.  Fanny reforms Henry for the better.  They marry and are excessively happy.  He proves that love can change you for the better and he becomes a faithful attentive husband captivated by Fanny's beauty and wit.  I'm going to pretend that they run off to London to help abolish slavery and they come into better fortune as everyone at Mansfield Park becomes subject to its decline in prosperity on account of their abysmal conduct.  In my ending, both Fanny and Henry show all her rubbish relatives that they are happier without all of them and live happily ever after.  The end.

More Jane Austen discussions below:

To see my ranking of Every Jane Austen Adaptation, go here.
For a discussion of all the Pride and Prejudice adaptations, you can go here.
For a discussion of all the Persuasion adaptations, you can go here.
For a discussion of all the Sense and Sensibility adaptations, you can go here.
For a discussion of all the Emma adaptations, you can go here.
For my discussion of all the Northanger Abbey Adaptations, you can go here.

For my discussion of the Lady Susan Adaptation (Love and Friendship), you can go here. 

For my discussion of all the "Not-Quite-Austen's" you can go here.

I have a whole page dedicated to Jane Austen where you can find my rankings of different movie adaptations and essays etc.

All Things Jane Austen